Select an instance node Graph tab or an instance check-box Results tab enabling you to change the following states user permission dependent :. Results State - useful for disregarding false positives or just for planning what issues to handle. Not Exploitable — instance has been confirmed as not exploitable i. Instances defined with this state are not represented in the scan summary, graph, reports or dashboard, etc. Depending on your user permissions you may not be able to select the "Not Exploitable" state.
Proposed Not Exploitable — instance has been proposed as not exploitable i. Instances defined with this state are represented in the scan summary, graph, reports or dashboard, etc.
Urgent — instance has been confirmed as exploitable and requires urgent handling. It is also possible to customize result states to your own preferences.
Contact Checkmarx customer support for more information. Result Severity High, Medium, Low and Info - u seful for defining the priority level of the selected issue. When the state of an instance is changed i. A popup window is displayed if enabled listing all the affected instances including the project name, scan date and a direct link to the affected instance. Assign to User - u seful for planning who should handle the selected issue.
Click Comments to add a comment to an instance. This metadata is maintained for the project when performing future scans and for instances that continue to be found. Click Save Scan Subset for selected instances to appear in the results list as an independent result set. If configured, tickets can be opened in a bug tracking system e. Jira by clicking Open ticket. Click the link icon to obtain a URL to this results interface with the instance immediately selected.
Path upper-right pane - Displays the full path of code elements that constitute the vulnerability instance that is selected in the Results pane. Manage Certificates Like a Pro. Contact details collected on InfoSec Insights may be used to send you requested information, blog update notices, and for marketing purposes. Learn more Danny is a writer and editor with a background in journalism, marketing and communications.
He is a tech enthusiast and writes about technology, website security and cyber security. Info missing - Please tell us where to send your free PDF! Manage your certificates like a pro. November 9, 0. November 3, 0. November 1, 0. October 28, 0. October 25, 0.
October 22, 0. October 19, 0. July 6, 0. July 1, 0. June 23, 0. October 10, 0. September 13, 0. July 20, 0. July 8, 0. May 31, 0. April 3, 0. March 15, 0. November 11, 0. November 6, 0. Latest Most commented. Search this site Close search Search for: Search.
This illustration represents the lifecycle of a vulnerability and where a cybercriminal could potentially exploit a vulnerability. About the author Danny Lewis Danny is a writer and editor with a background in journalism, marketing and communications.
You might also like. What Is Vishing? June 23, May 6, Best 50 Tips Therefore, moving the focus from perpetually investing resources into manually and arduously patching vulnerabilities, to automatically identifying and preventing the exploitation attempt itself through proactive security controls could provide a much-needed remedy.
There lies a common denominator in all of this. For every single type of memory-based vulnerability, a certain step must be performed which is distinctly recognizable and identical across all attacks. Focusing on identifying and preventing that step could eliminate an entire class of existing and future memory-based vulnerabilities from potential exploitation.
Going back to the memory-vulnerability exploitation, we can actually see it in action. Luckily for defenders, in order to exploit a memory-based vulnerability, the attack must corrupt the memory in some way: writing outside of bounds, or corrupting existing data in the memory for instance. Without corrupting the memory, attackers cannot use the vulnerability to cause any damage. Hence, the corruption of the memory is a distinct, necessary, and compulsory step to every memory vulnerability exploitation which takes place.
This makes the existence of the vulnerability meaningless. EIV operates the same way for many different classes of vulnerability. The result is achieving a sustainable, long-term, cybersecurity peace of mind. EIV has reached a For our customers, patching and updating happens if at all at their own choice, along with an already pre-scheduled update.
They are no longer hostage to critical vulnerabilities, forcing them to speed up and update in order to avoid disaster.
0コメント